<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Association for Learning Technology (ALT) certification scheme - slightly bonkers in one respect!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephenp.net/2007/06/03/association-for-learning-technology-alt-certification-scheme-slightly-bonkers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephenp.net/2007/06/03/association-for-learning-technology-alt-certification-scheme-slightly-bonkers/</link>
	<description>A specialist in inquiry-based, work-focussed, online supported learning</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 02:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shirley</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenp.net/2007/06/03/association-for-learning-technology-alt-certification-scheme-slightly-bonkers/#comment-13140</link>
		<dc:creator>Shirley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jul 2007 00:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenp.net/2007/06/03/association-for-learning-technology-alt-certification-scheme-slightly-bonkers/#comment-13140</guid>
		<description>Congratulations - and thanks for the info on the five-year plan.  I think I'll stick to being an expert without the bits of paper!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations - and thanks for the info on the five-year plan.  I think I&#8217;ll stick to being an expert without the bits of paper!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenp.net/2007/06/03/association-for-learning-technology-alt-certification-scheme-slightly-bonkers/#comment-10752</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jun 2007 06:01:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenp.net/2007/06/03/association-for-learning-technology-alt-certification-scheme-slightly-bonkers/#comment-10752</guid>
		<description>Hi Gill, good to hear from you and glad you have settled in!  I don't have an up-to-date email address for you.  If you read this please send me an email to stephen.powell@core-ed.net.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Gill, good to hear from you and glad you have settled in!  I don&#8217;t have an up-to-date email address for you.  If you read this please send me an email to <a href="mailto:stephen.powell@core-ed.net">stephen.powell@core-ed.net</a>.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gill Roberts</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenp.net/2007/06/03/association-for-learning-technology-alt-certification-scheme-slightly-bonkers/#comment-10631</link>
		<dc:creator>Gill Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Jun 2007 16:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenp.net/2007/06/03/association-for-learning-technology-alt-certification-scheme-slightly-bonkers/#comment-10631</guid>
		<description>Congratulations Stephen. Just making ccontact again after a long lapse. We are now in our house in Buffelspoort, SA with plenty of guest accommodation!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations Stephen. Just making ccontact again after a long lapse. We are now in our house in Buffelspoort, SA with plenty of guest accommodation!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Powell</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenp.net/2007/06/03/association-for-learning-technology-alt-certification-scheme-slightly-bonkers/#comment-9595</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Powell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 20:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenp.net/2007/06/03/association-for-learning-technology-alt-certification-scheme-slightly-bonkers/#comment-9595</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the information Seb, good to read that CMALT will be both responsive and inclusive of its members views.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the information Seb, good to read that CMALT will be both responsive and inclusive of its members views.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seb Schmoller</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenp.net/2007/06/03/association-for-learning-technology-alt-certification-scheme-slightly-bonkers/#comment-9450</link>
		<dc:creator>Seb Schmoller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 09:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenp.net/2007/06/03/association-for-learning-technology-alt-certification-scheme-slightly-bonkers/#comment-9450</guid>
		<description>An interesting post, Stephen.

Concerning the validity of your CMALT certificate, the "rules" currently say:

CMALT certification will remain valid for no more than 5 years, with the strong likelihood
that triennial renewal will become a requirement. To renew your certification you will be
required to resubmit an amended portfolio for review by ALT. If ALT judges your resubmitted
portfolio to fall short of the CMALT standards then pertaining, you will be entitled to resubmit it for review once more. If after review your portfolio is judged by ALT still to fall
short of the CMALT criteria you will revert to being an Individual Member, and, when your
membership is next due for renewal, you will be charged at the individual rate - currently
Â£52 per annum (Â£25 for students, retired, unemployed; Â£65 overseas).

This is a new scheme, and we are have yet to decide on the renewal frequency. What we are sure of is that renewals will be judged on a much lighter touch basis than initial applications, essentially to ensure that the holder is still practising and developing as a learning technologist.

A blog may not be the best place to discuss this, but certainly your post above, and any other views you let us have, will be on the table when we are deciding on the renewal process and frequency.


Seb Schmoller</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting post, Stephen.</p>
<p>Concerning the validity of your CMALT certificate, the &#8220;rules&#8221; currently say:</p>
<p>CMALT certification will remain valid for no more than 5 years, with the strong likelihood<br />
that triennial renewal will become a requirement. To renew your certification you will be<br />
required to resubmit an amended portfolio for review by ALT. If ALT judges your resubmitted<br />
portfolio to fall short of the CMALT standards then pertaining, you will be entitled to resubmit it for review once more. If after review your portfolio is judged by ALT still to fall<br />
short of the CMALT criteria you will revert to being an Individual Member, and, when your<br />
membership is next due for renewal, you will be charged at the individual rate - currently<br />
Â£52 per annum (Â£25 for students, retired, unemployed; Â£65 overseas).</p>
<p>This is a new scheme, and we are have yet to decide on the renewal frequency. What we are sure of is that renewals will be judged on a much lighter touch basis than initial applications, essentially to ensure that the holder is still practising and developing as a learning technologist.</p>
<p>A blog may not be the best place to discuss this, but certainly your post above, and any other views you let us have, will be on the table when we are deciding on the renewal process and frequency.</p>
<p>Seb Schmoller</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
