<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stephen Downes on PLE at MIT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephenp.net/2007/04/13/stephen-downes-on-ple-at-mit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephenp.net/2007/04/13/stephen-downes-on-ple-at-mit/</link>
	<description>A specialist in inquiry-based, work-focussed, online supported learning</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 07:24:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Millwood</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenp.net/2007/04/13/stephen-downes-on-ple-at-mit/comment-page-1/#comment-3358</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Millwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 07:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenp.net/2007/04/13/stephen-downes-on-ple-at-mit/#comment-3358</guid>
		<description>&quot;If this were to work really well, rather than searching for resources the system ought to have a predictive capability in which â€œthe resources present themselves to youâ€.&quot;
This is seductive, but what about the process of enquiry and the formulation of question, sifting of results, evaluating of results etc.? Agreed information should be accessible, but if it presents itself (as though the information or the system actually understood anything at all! - another source of sceptism on my part) - who made the learning decisions?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If this were to work really well, rather than searching for resources the system ought to have a predictive capability in which â€œthe resources present themselves to youâ€.&#8221;<br />
This is seductive, but what about the process of enquiry and the formulation of question, sifting of results, evaluating of results etc.? Agreed information should be accessible, but if it presents itself (as though the information or the system actually understood anything at all! &#8211; another source of sceptism on my part) &#8211; who made the learning decisions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

